NIA, state govt oppose Sudha Bharadwaj’s bail plea in Bombay HC

[ad_1]


The Investigation Agency (NIA) on Monday opposed the bail plea of the Elgar Parishad case accused Sudha Bharadwaj, a rights activist, who moved the for default bail.


Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Anil Singh argued no valid default bail plea as his main grounds to oppose the default bail application filed by the accused Sudha Bhardwaj in the Elgar Parishad case.





Singh told the court, “There was no valid default bail plea filed under section 167(2) of CrPC. Because the right of default bail applies only after 90 days of actual arrest and before the charge sheet is filed. In this case, three default bail applications were filed. First default bail before 90 days of arrest and the other two were filed after the charge sheet. So No valid bail plea.”


“Cognisance on the charge sheet has nothing to do with the default bail application as both are independent issues. The only delay in filing of charge sheet is relevant ground for default bail,” said Singh.


He further said, “Sections 13 and 16 of NIA act clearly say that NIA court’s role comes only at the trial stage and presently the case is in pre-trial stage So based on this fact also, a challenge to court jurisdiction is not a valid argument for seeking default bail.”


In her submissions before the court, Sudha Bharadwaj had stated that the judge who took confidence in the charge sheet against her was not a designated special judge. The same judge granted an extension of time to the NIA to file the charge sheet, said in her default bail plea.


Sudha Bharadwaj was arrested in August 2018 in connection with the Bhima Koregaon/Elgar Parishad case.


Referring to one of the Supreme Court’s judgements to support his case, Singh said, “Even if the initial remand is not by the proper court and subsequently there is a remand by the proper court, the same get regularised.


The is likely to conclude the hearing on the bail plea of Sudha Bhardwaj on default grounds in the case today.


Singh, appearing for the Investigation Agency concluded his arguments for the investigation agency and Advocate General (AG) Ashutosh Kumbhakoni has completed arguments for Maharashtra state.


The court will hear the matter today at 10 am.

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Dear Reader,

Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.

We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor



[ad_2]

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *